Removing flexibility can undermine redeployment offers, says FWC

The Fair Work Commission recently ruled that reducing an employee’s work-from-home arrangements contributed to a redeployment offer being unacceptable. What does this mean for employers making redeployment decisions in the age of flexibility?

When does workplace banter cross the line into bullying?

Defendants in bullying and harassment cases sometimes claim their behaviour was simply reflective of their workplace culture. But how much weight does this defence carry in the eyes of the law?

HRM’s top 10 most popular articles of 2024

From some legislative significant changes and FWC rulings to practical guidance around support people, culture challenges and managing change fatigue, here’s what got you clicking in 2024.

4 legal tips to keep in mind when issuing a redeployment offer

In a recent case, the FWC found that an unsuitable redeployment offer did not justify reducing an employee’s redundancy pay. How can employers ensure their redeployment policies stand up to scrutiny?

Non-compete clauses face increasing scrutiny amid calls for reform

Non-compete clauses are in the spotlight following significant legal developments in Australia and abroad. Could it be the time of reckoning for these restraints?

Dismissing an employee who refused to return to the office was unfair, rules FWC

The Fair Work Commission has awarded compensation to an employee who was sacked for refusing to give up her decade-long work-from-home arrangement.

What to include in your drug and alcohol policy

A recent FWC case has shed light on the dangers of inadequate policies and procedures relating to drug and alcohol use. How can HR craft a drug and alcohol policy that stands up to scrutiny?

FWC backs employer’s refusal of remote work request

In a recent landmark case, the FWC ruled in favour of an employer’s right to refuse a remote work request. What are the implications of this ruling for the future of hybrid and remote work?

When can you dismiss an employee for not meeting their KPIs?

The FWC recently found an employee’s termination for failure to meet KPIs unfair due to ‘arbitrary’ and ‘unreasonable’ sales targets. What went wrong for the employer in this case, and how can HR avoid similar claims arising?